Biden Pressed on Emissions Goal        04/19 06:16

   When President Joe Biden convenes a virtual climate summit on Thursday, he 
faces a vexing task: how to put forward a nonbinding but symbolic goal to 
reduce greenhouse gas emissions that will have a tangible impact on climate 
change efforts not only in the U.S. but throughout the world.

   WASHINGTON (AP) -- When President Joe Biden convenes a virtual climate 
summit on Thursday, he faces a vexing task: how to put forward a nonbinding but 
symbolic goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions that will have a tangible 
impact on climate change efforts not only in the U.S. but throughout the world.

   The emissions target, eagerly awaited by all sides of the climate debate, 
will signal how aggressively Biden wants to move on climate change, a divisive 
and expensive issue that has riled Republicans to complain about job-killing 
government overreach even as some on the left worry Biden has not gone far 
enough to address a profound threat to the planet.

   The climate crisis poses a complex political challenge for Biden, since the 
problem is harder to see and far more difficult to produce measurable results 
on than either the coronavirus pandemic relief package or the infrastructure 
bill.

   The target Biden chooses "is setting the tone for the level of ambition and 
the pace of emission reductions over the next decade," said Kate Larsen, a 
former White House adviser who helped develop President Barack Obama's climate 
action plan.

   The number has to be achievable by 2030 but aggressive enough to satisfy 
scientists and advocates who call the coming decade a crucial, make-or-break 
moment for slowing climate change, Larsen and other experts said.

   Scientists, environmental groups and even business leaders are calling on 
Biden to set a target that would cut U.S. greenhouse gas emissions by at least 
50% below 2005 levels by 2030.

   The 50% target, which most experts consider a likely outcome of intense 
deliberations underway at the White House, would nearly double the nation's 
previous commitment and require dramatic changes in the power and 
transportation sectors, including significant increases in renewable energy 
such as wind and solar power and steep cuts in emissions from fossil fuels such 
as coal and oil.

   Anything short of that goal could undermine Biden's promise to prevent 
temperatures from rising more than 1.5 degrees Celsius, experts say, while 
likely stirring up sharp criticism from international allies and Biden's own 
supporters

   The target is significant, not just as a visible goal for the U.S. to 
achieve after four years of climate inaction under President Donald Trump, but 
also for "leveraging other countries,'' Larsen said. "That helps domestically 
in the battle that comes after, which is implementing policies to achieve that 
target. We can make a better case politically at home if other countries are 
acting at the same level of ambition as the U.S."

   The 2030 goal, known as a Nationally Determined Contribution, or NDC, is a 
key part of the Paris climate agreement, which Biden rejoined on his first day 
in office. It's also an important marker as Biden moves toward his ultimate 
goal of net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.

   "Clearly the science demands at least 50%" in reduced greenhouse gas 
emissions by 2030, said Jake Schmidt, a climate expert at the Natural Resources 
Defense Council, a leading environmental group.

   The 50% target "is ambitious, but it is achievable,'' he said in an 
interview. It's also a good climate message, he said: "People know what 50% 
means -- it's half.''

   Whatever target Biden picks, the climate summit itself "proves the U.S. is 
back in rejoining the international effort" to address climate change, said 
Larsen, now a director at the Rhodium Group, an independent research firm.

   The summit is "the starting gun for climate diplomacy" after a four-year 
"hiatus" under Trump, she said. John Kerry, Biden's climate envoy, has been 
pressing global leaders in person and online ahead of the summit for 
commitments and alliances on climate efforts.

   Nathaniel Keohane, another former Obama White House adviser and now a vice 
president at the Environmental Defense Fund, said experts have coalesced around 
the need to reduce emissions by at least 50% by 2030.

   "The number has to start with 5," he said, adding, "We've done the math. We 
need at least 50%.''

   The 2030 target is just one in a sometimes overlapping set of goals that 
Biden has outlined on climate. He also has said he expects to adopt a clean 
energy standard that would make electricity carbon-free by 2035, along with the 
wider goal of net-zero carbon emissions economy-wide by 2050.

   Biden's climate adviser, Gina McCarthy, acknowledged that the sheer volume 
of numbers can be confusing. At a forum last week, she and former New York 
Mayor Michael Bloomberg said climate activists should focus on actions in the 
next decade.

   "Let's stop talking about 2050,'' said McCarthy, who is leading White House 
efforts to develop U.S. climate commitments for 2030.

   Bloomberg, 79, was even more blunt: 2050 "is a good number for people who 
give speeches, but I don't know anyone giving those speeches who's going to be 
alive in 2050.''

   Some Republican lawmakers call the focus on reducing U.S. emissions 
counter-productive, saying Biden's plan would raise energy costs and kill 
American jobs while allowing Russia, China and other countries to increase 
greenhouse gas emissions.

   "The Biden administration will set punishing targets for the United States, 
while our adversaries keep the status quo. That won't solve climate change,'' 
said Sen. Wyoming Sen. John Barrasso, the top Republican on the Senate Energy 
Committee. The United States already leads the world in reducing carbon 
emissions, Barrasso said, adding that Biden should try to "make American energy 
as clean as we can, as fast as we can, without raising costs for consumers."

   Some on the left think Biden is not going far enough.

   Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a New York Democrat who has called for a 
massive Green New Deal, said Biden deserves "a lot of credit" for his 
infrastructure plan's vision and scope, but said it falls far short of what is 
needed to meaningfully combat the climate crisis. She and her supporters are 
calling for at least $10 trillion in federal spending over the next decade to 
address climate change and other problems.

   McCarthy disputed the notion that Biden has backtracked from campaign 
promises to lead on climate.

   "We're always either doing too little or too much,'' she told reporters 
earlier this month. "But rest assured that the president put a (spending) 
number out here that he felt was not just defensible but required to meet this 
moment in time.''

   Much of the proposed spending to address climate change is included in 
Biden's $2.3 trillion infrastructure bill.

   If Republicans think less money should be spent on clean energy and 
infrastructure, McCarthy added, "then we'll have those conversations."

   Marcella Burke, a former Trump administration official who now is an energy 
lawyer in Houston, gives Biden an "A-Plus for enthusiasm" on climate, but an 
incomplete on details. "We've had a lot of goals, but not a lot of strategy 
announced to get there,'' she said. "So the jury is still out.''